Examine the Foundation
Before accepting — or rejecting — Christianity, understand what it actually teaches.
Why does something still feel missing?
Modern culture offers information without structure.
We have more access to knowledge than any generation before us, yet anxiety continues to rise. Motivation surges briefly and collapses quickly. Moral standards shift not over centuries, but over news cycles. Truth is debated as preference rather than principle.
We are not lacking opinions. We are lacking foundations.
When there is no stable reference point, clarity erodes. When clarity erodes, behavior becomes inconsistent. When behavior becomes inconsistent, life begins to feel chaotic — not because of emotion, but because of structure.
The question is not whether people believe something. The question is whether what they believe can support weight.
What Christianity Actually Claims
Before Christianity is rejected — or accepted — it should be understood accurately.
Christianity does not begin with vague spiritual sentiment. It begins with a claim about reality. It claims that history pivoted on a specific person: Jesus of Nazareth.
It claims that Jesus was not merely a moral teacher, but uniquely authoritative — that He made direct claims about truth, sin, forgiveness, and eternal life.
Most importantly, Christianity claims that Jesus physically rose from the dead. This is not symbolic language.
If the resurrection did not happen, Christianity collapses. If it did happen, neutrality collapses.
The credibility of Christianity rests not on emotional appeal, but on the historicity of an event. That is a serious claim. It deserves serious examination.
The Problem of Sin — Misunderstood
Modern culture often reduces “sin” to religious guilt language. But in its original meaning, sin describes misalignment with reality — a fracture between human behavior and the moral order woven into existence.
If objective moral truth exists, then deviation from it is not merely social error. It is structural disorder.
Christianity teaches that instability in culture mirrors instability in the human heart. The problem is not simply external systems. It is internal corruption — pride, self-rule, and moral autonomy elevated above truth.
That diagnosis is uncomfortable. But if it is accurate, surface-level self-improvement cannot solve it.
Why Grace Is Different
Most belief systems operate on moral performance: improve enough, earn enough, behave enough.
Christianity claims something fundamentally different. It argues that moral effort cannot repair a structural fracture. Restoration must be initiated by God — not achieved by humans.
Grace is not permission to ignore morality. It is the claim that restoration begins with forgiveness, not performance.
Either that is wishful thinking — or it is revolutionary truth. It should be examined carefully.
Foundation Determines Endurance
In one of His teachings, Jesus described two builders. Both built structures. Both faced storms. Only one endured.
The difference was not sincerity. It was foundation.
Christianity argues that stability — in thought, identity, morality, and eternity — depends on what your life rests upon.
That is not emotional language. It is structural language. And structure can be evaluated.
The 5-Day Foundation Series
This is not a devotional. It is a guided examination.
Five structured emails exploring:
- Who Jesus claimed to be
- Whether the resurrection is historically defensible
- What “sin” actually means
- Why grace differs from moral self-improvement
- What it means to build on a foundation
No hype. No manipulation. No pressure. Just structured clarity.
Begin the Examination
You'll receive 1 Email a day for 5 days in a row. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Reliability of the New Testament Documents
Christianity does not ask for blind acceptance of anonymous mythology. The New Testament documents emerged within the lifetime of eyewitnesses and circulated in environments where claims could be challenged.
They reference real places, real rulers, and real regions — and they were proclaimed publicly in hostile settings, not protected bubbles.
Even skeptical historians generally grant several baseline facts: Jesus existed; He was crucified under Pontius Pilate; His followers sincerely believed they saw Him alive afterward; and the movement expanded rapidly in hostile environments.
The question is not whether something happened. The question is what best explains it.
Dismissal without investigation is not intellectual caution. It is avoidance.
The Problem of Evil
If God exists, why is there suffering? This question deserves seriousness, not slogans.
Christianity does not deny suffering. It centers on it. The central figure of Christianity was executed publicly.
The claim is not that pain is unreal. The claim is that justice and restoration ultimately exist beyond it.
If moral outrage against evil is meaningful, it assumes a moral standard beyond preference. When we say something is “wrong,” we appeal to a standard we did not invent.
The existence of evil does not automatically eliminate God. It may point toward the necessity of ultimate justice.
Culture, Truth, and Moral Confusion
Modern culture increasingly treats truth as fluid. But stable civilizations are not built on fluid foundations.
When truth becomes personal preference, disagreement becomes hostility. When moral standards are severed from objective grounding, power replaces principle.
Christianity asserts that truth is not invented by individuals. It is grounded in reality — and ultimately grounded in God.
That claim is either restrictive — or stabilizing. But it cannot be ignored without consequence.
Intellectual Voices on Order and Creation
Quoting well-known thinkers does not prove theology. But it does show that serious minds have wrestled with the question of order — and what best explains it.
“The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.” — Albert Einstein
Einstein did not affirm orthodox Christianity, but he repeatedly acknowledged the deep intelligibility and rational structure of the universe. Order invites explanation.
One classical line of reasoning is simple: where we observe structured systems, we instinctively infer structure-givers. In everyday life, creation implies a creator — design implies a designer.
You may have heard the idea expressed like this: “In order for creation to exist, there must be a Creator.” That sentence is best treated as a summary of the design argument, not as a verified quote to attribute to a specific public figure.
“I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.” — C.S. Lewis
The point is not argument by celebrity. The point is that the questions are legitimate: Why is reality ordered? Why is life information-rich? Why is the human mind rational? Does matter alone explain mind — or does mind precede matter?
Those are foundational questions. They deserve careful examination.
Summary
Christianity does not request emotional surrender before examination. It presents claims — historical claims, philosophical claims, and moral claims.
If those claims are false, they should be rejected. If they are true, they cannot be ignored.
Stability requires foundation. Foundation requires examination.
Continue the Examination
The 5-Day Foundation Series is a structured, guided inquiry through the central claims of Christianity — with clarity, not pressure.
You'll receive 1 Email a day for 5 days in a row. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Notes & Sources
- Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions (Crown Publishing, 1954).
- Isaac Newton, “General Scholium,” Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1713 edition).
- C.S. Lewis, “Is Theology Poetry?” in The Weight of Glory (1949).
- Tacitus, Annals 15.44 (reference to the execution of Jesus under Pontius Pilate).
- Josephus, Antiquities 18.3.3 (reference to Jesus; scholarly discussion exists regarding later interpolation).